The average smartphone user uses about 25 applications. Contrary to appearances, this is a lot, especially from the point of view of the typical operation of a typical phone. Most of these apps run in the background, downloading data without user interaction, which affects device performance and battery life. We checked which applications are the most burdensome of our phones.
Some applications are more burdensome than others. In particular, those to support social networking sites are usually “heavier”, because all the time they “listen” on the servers for new notifications. Add to this the universality of social media services. For example, messenger is not just a messenger, it is also a Snapchat clone in which the possibility of exchanging text messages seems to be just an addition. Also, the complexity of mobile programs negatively affects the performance of our phone – a heavy-loading application is able to store several hundred megabytes of handheld data, reducing not only the computing power of the processor and energy in the battery, but also available space in memory.
Facebook is used by almost everyone. This means that the majority of mobile phone users use this platform with the help of a mobile application that puts a heavy burden on our smartphone, especially the battery. Facebook for Android also collects large amounts of data on our phone so that we can quickly reach the content from which we may want to use in a moment. These types of elements to “facilitate” our social life are not without significance for our smartphone. Continuous activity in the background also means that Facebook not only affects the battery, but also the overall performance of the phone. It is worth remembering if we are looking for solutions that allow us to optimize the management of energy on the smartphone.
Messenger
Zuckerberg’s website is not considered to be “light” in the social media environment and the same applies to the Messenger. Recently, the app for both Android and iOS has received completely new features that make the platform look like one of the most serious competitors – Snapchat. From the communicator level, we can take a picture, add interesting effects, signatures, objects and send to our friends. Support for such extended functions by Messenger determines the necessity of constantly polling servers in search of state changes (new message, new content on Messenger Day, new voice connection, etc.), as well as saving large amounts of data in the phone’s memory. On the occasion of a very active use of the Messenger, it may turn out that he is responsible for draining the battery. It is also irrelevant to the overall performance of the device.
This is the third in this article program from Mark Zuckerberg’s stable suffering from exactly the same problems that troubled Messenger and Facebook. Apparently, the social giant sees nothing wrong with it and does nothing about complaining about users. They report problems with excessive use of resources, energy, but also move to alternatives, which unfortunately are very few. In addition, they do not offer the full suite of features present in the original applications. In the case of Instagram – a program focused mainly on photos, the problem is to store large amounts of data on the device and to constantly listen to servers in search of new notifications. For this reason, active users of this social network may complain about shorter phone operating time on a single charge and general hardware slowdown with Instagram installed.
Somewhat less popular among all, the social service is also able to put a heavy burden on our device. Users complain mainly about poor application optimization, that is, adjusting its code in such a way that it makes the best use of the device’s capabilities while at the same time consuming less battery power. The problem of Twitter is not only the storage of huge amounts of data on the device, but also the need to constantly listen to servers in search of new notifications. There are a lot of these in Twitter – from checking our location on a regular basis, to running streams of so-called. “most important content” on the website. The desired, rapid action of this social medium largely depends on the work of the program in the background. This in turn negatively affects the performance of the phone and its working length on one charge cycle.
Yes, social applications heavily charge phones